<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HIBC &#187; buying mix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hibc.co.uk/category/buying-mix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hibc.co.uk</link>
	<description>success = strategy + planning + execution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How can we revise the marketing mix 4Ps to be more customer focussed?</title>
		<link>http://www.hibc.co.uk/the-marketing-mix-4ps/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-marketing-mix-4ps</link>
		<comments>http://www.hibc.co.uk/the-marketing-mix-4ps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Allsopp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Allsopp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hibc.co.uk/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to take a swipe at the traditional 4Ps of the marketing mix which business schools have considered &#8220;de rigeur&#8221; for decades. We are all familiar with the marketing mix 4Ps: Product, Place, Promotion &#38; Price, with Physical Evidence,   &#8230; <a href="http://www.hibc.co.uk/the-marketing-mix-4ps/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to take a swipe at the traditional 4Ps of the marketing mix which business schools have considered &#8220;de rigeur&#8221; for decades.</p>
<p>We are all familiar with the marketing mix 4Ps: Product, Place, Promotion &amp; Price, with Physical Evidence,   often added as an optional extra (some will add a couple more Ps).  I&#8217;ll happily discuss the marketing mix and how we can use these headings to shape our approach to the market and I&#8217;m not suggesting we should abandon them entirely.  But, and here&#8217;s the swipe, these are approaches from the supplier side.  What about the customer perspective?</p>
<p>Yep, radical as it may seem we need to view these elements from the customer perspective.  I suggest that for each P also consider what I call &#8220;the buying mix&#8221;.  Let&#8217;s apply some letters (this is not original, but can&#8217;t recall where I got it from during my studies all those years ago) and &#8220;A&#8221; will do nicely:</p>
<p>Product: <strong>Acceptability</strong> &#8211; how acceptable to your target customer(s) are the products or services: do they do meet the buyers&#8217; requirement(s).<br />
Place: <strong>Availability </strong>- where and how readily can your customer(s) get their hands on your products or services.<br />
Promotion: <strong>Awareness </strong>- how and how easily can your customers find out about  your products and how to get them.<br />
Price: <strong>Affordability</strong> &#8211; you may think it is a good and fair price but can your target customers actually afford it.</p>
<p>Just to make sure we haven&#8217;t missed any, let&#8217;s also take Physical Evidence&#8230;how about <strong>Aesthetics</strong> or <strong>Appearance</strong>&#8230;which offer a differentiation from whether a product does the job by adding the very important elements of fashion, smell or  cleanliness (quite important for a restaurant don&#8217;t you think!).</p>
<p>So, for a really customer focussed approach, think <strong>buying mix 4As and marketing mix 4Ps</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hibc.co.uk/the-marketing-mix-4ps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the marketing mix one dimensional?</title>
		<link>http://www.hibc.co.uk/is-the-marketing-mix-one-dimensional/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-the-marketing-mix-one-dimensional</link>
		<comments>http://www.hibc.co.uk/is-the-marketing-mix-one-dimensional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keith Allsopp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Allsopp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing mix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating mix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hibc.co.uk/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would argue yes.  I believe the marketing mix is generally used as a flat, mono-dimensional guide to managing a business.  It ignores the multiplicity of interactions between the business, its capabilities/competences and the market.  So, I hear you ask, &#8230; <a href="http://www.hibc.co.uk/is-the-marketing-mix-one-dimensional/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue yes.  I believe the marketing mix is generally used as a flat, mono-dimensional guide to managing a business.  It ignores the multiplicity of interactions between the business, its capabilities/competences and the market.  So, I hear you ask, what will serve us better?</p>
<p>Well, I’ll try this analogy. I like to cook, and pulling together a good meal is more than just chucking a few ingredients in a pan.  The perfect meal needs the careful combinations of ingredients, flavours, pots and pans, cooker, timing and, of course, a cook to blend everything together for the optimum results: in short a carefully designed recipe, perhaps tweaked as you follow it, that brings all of these things together to give you the resulting foodie pleasures.</p>
<p>In the same way, a successful business is created and sustained by bringing together every aspect of your business.  I call this the <strong>business mix</strong> and find this to be a good representation:</p>
<div>
<dl id="attachment_149">
<dt><a href="http://kkallsopp.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/business-matrix1.png"><img class="aligncenter" title="business-matrix" src="http://kkallsopp.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/business-matrix1.png" alt="mapping the marketing mix to the business" width="450" height="251" /></a></dt>
<dd>creating a recipe for sustainable competitive advantage starts here</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>By combining the operational and marketing mixes, we can begin to map the interactions between the various ingredients for our successful recipe.  Using this format as a starting point, and populating the business mix to fit your business, you can to collate all of the aspects of your business that impact its results: and that really will be all aspects of your business.</p>
<p>As product managers, or indeed general managers and executives, we need to work across the whole business mix to achieve the sustainable advantage we all want.</p>
<p>So, what should we then do with all of this newly tabulated insight? Well, I find that applying a ranking system to identify those most important, versus those less so, along with competence/capability rating helps.  And mapping a SWOT to the results really can focus the mind, and help you to focus the right resources, on the most important elements of the business mix for your business’ success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hibc.co.uk/is-the-marketing-mix-one-dimensional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
